Introducing SensitiveString, your shield against inadvertent exposure of sensitive information in application logs and beyond. This lightweight NuGet package wraps strings in a protective layer, ensuring that sensitive data remains secure and inaccessible without explicit handling. Safeguard your users' privacy and your application's integrity effortlessly with SensitiveString.
Introducing SensitiveString, your shield against inadvertent exposure of sensitive information in application logs and beyond.
This lightweight NuGet package wraps strings in a protective layer, ensuring that sensitive data remains secure and inaccessible without explicit handling.
Safeguard your users' privacy and your application's integrity effortlessly with SensitiveString.
Example
Let's try to initialize and print a simple record with personal information:
internal record PersonDto(string Name, SensitiveString PhoneNumber, SensitiveEmail Email);using SensitiveString;
var person = new PersonDto(
"John Doe",
"(800) 555‑0123".AsSensitive(),
"john.doe@example.com".AsSensitiveEmail()
);
Console.WriteLine($"Person info: {person}");
What we get in the console is:
Person info: PersonDto { Name = John Doe, PhoneNumber = ***, Email = ***@example.com }
The SensitiveString and SensitiveEmail types are straightforward string wrappers. Without special handling, their content remains hidden from standard stringifiers and serializers. So if you're afraid some sensitive data may leak into application logs when stringified implicitly, use one of these two types to prevent that.
SensitiveEmail differs from SensitiveString only in how it masks the original value. If you prefer having emails fully masked rather than the login part before @, use the SensitiveString instead.
Serialization/deserialization
In client-server communication we want the information in its original form present in the data being transmitted between the parties. Because, however, of how the types are designed, without explicit handling, serializers will output nothing but an empty object.
Therefore, to use the type in DTOs, you'll need to extend your serializers in use with special converters to handle these types. Converters for the System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer are available in this repository and are part of the associated NuGet package. See below how serialization behaves with and without them.
Let's use the same person object as in the example used earlier:
using System.Text.Json;
...
var serialized = JsonSerializer.Serialize(person);
Console.WriteLine($"Serialized: {serialized}");
As you can see, the sensitive strings are just empty JSON objects {}.
Now let's add appropriate converters to serializer options:
using System.Text.Json;
using SensitiveString.Json;
...
var serializerOptions = new JsonSerializerOptions();
serializerOptions.AddSensitiveStringSupport();
var serialized = JsonSerializer.Serialize(person, serializerOptions);
Console.WriteLine($"Serialized: {serialized}");
The same options should be used for deserialization.
REST API
To make sure your web API handles the types correctly, call this on startup:
builder.Services
.AddControllers()
.AddJsonOptions(
o => o.JsonSerializerOptions.AddSensitiveStringSupport()
);
builder.Services.ConfigureHttpJsonOptions(
o => o.SerializerOptions.AddSensitiveStringSupport()
);
Swagger/OpenAPI documentation
To make sure the SensitiveString and SensitiveEmail types are represented well in your Swagger/OpenApi documentation, install a dedicated NuGet package.
EntityFrameworkCore
To use SensitiveString and SensitiveEmail in database entities, install a dedicated NuGet package.
HotChocolate (GraphQL)
To use SensitiveString and SensitiveEmail in GraphQL inputs and responses, install a dedicated NuGet package.
FluentValidation
RuleFor(x => (string) x.Email)
Disclaimer
This is a proof of concept. If you find any issues using the package or have any thoughts on it, your comments reported as issues are more than welcome!
